Administration of Justice Bulletin #2013/02
Remote Testimony and Related Procedures Impacting a Criminal Defendant's Confrontation Rights
Friday, February 1, 2013
Since the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington, and even more so after its ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, interest has been growing in the use of remote testimony as a method to satisfy the Confrontation Clause when a witness cannot be present at trial. Almost all recent proposals for implementation of remote testimony have called for remote two-way testimony. This bulletin discusses the viability of such a technique and alternatives to it.
Download (Remote Testimony and Related Procedures Impacting a Criminal Defendant's Confrontation Rights, 297.37 KB)
Public Officials - Courts and Judicial Administration Roles
Topics - Courts and Judicial Administration