In re C.S.L.B., 254 N.C. App. 395 (2017) (originally unpublished but subsequently published)
Held:
Affirmed in Part
- A court is not required to make findings under G.S. 7B-906.2(b) when it does not eliminate reunification as a concurrent permanent plan. The court did not eliminate reunification as a permanent plan when the permanency planning order was a primary plan of guardianship with a relative, which was ordered, and secondary plan of reunification.
Category:
Abuse, Neglect, DependencyStage:
Disposition (All Stages Post-Adjudication)Topic:
Findings