California Tackles Substitute Analysts Post-Williams
Published for NC Criminal Law on December 03, 2012.
In a paper here I analyze Williams v. Illinois, the U.S. Supreme Court’s latest confrontation decision on substitute analyst testimony. Because Williams was a fractured opinion in which no rationale garnered five votes, it didn’t answer a lot of questions. Three companion cases recently decided by the California Supreme Court show how one court is ... Read more
The post California Tackles Substitute Analysts Post-Williams appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law.